Tag Archives: eDiscovery

eDiscovery Fundamentals CLE

Despite the increased importance of eDiscovery in today’s legal world many attorneys still don’t even know the basics… what’s ESI??? How do you respond to a litigation hold? What are native files?

What is ESI??

If you’re a trial attorney and you don’t know what ESI is… then you need to take this CLE course!

In today’s electronic world, being prepared to properly respond to eDiscovery demands can make or break your client’s case – and your litigation budget. In this CLE course Alex Marjanovic and Greg Mahoney show you the most efficient way to respond to eDiscovery by discussing the key terms you need to know to get results, litigation holds and the three primary methods that firms are currently handling e-discovery. To access the course please click here: eDiscovery Fundamentals.

Three Primary eDiscovery Methods

Alex and Greg also review the three primary eDiscovery methods and  provides a cost benefit analysis and the potential for sanctions with each of the three methods (1) Review on your computer (2) Review hard copy of ESI and (3) Review in database. The analysis of the three methods is conducted with the use of a sample data set that could be found in any litigation matter today.

Alex Marjanovic is the Managing Partner of Sales at Epiq, a national and international provider of electronic discovery services, with responsibility over the Southwestern States of the U.S. He has had extensive experience with electronic and paper-based discovery and related litigation production/discovery matters over the past 14 years. Greg Mahoney is the Director of Legal Solutions at Epiq Global. He collaborates with law firms, government agencies and corporations throughout the eDiscovery process.

This CLE course is offered in the following states:

Alaska (AK)

Arizona (AZ)

California (CA)

Connecticut (CT)

District of Columbia (DC)

Illinois (IL)

Maryland (MD)

Massachusetts (MA)

Michigan (MI)

Missouri (MO)

New Hampshire (NH)

New Jersey (NJ)

New York (NY)

North Dakota (ND)

Pennsylvania (PA)

South Dakota (SD)

Attorney Credits offers CLE for attorneys in Illinois and around the country. For more information about CLE in Illinois please click the following link: IL CLE.

Tagged , , , , , ,

New CLE Course on Avoiding and Obtaining Discovery Sanctions When Dealing with ESI

You’re involved in international litigation representing a local company that sold high tech electronic equipment to an English firm. As soon as discovery starts, the English company claims that four key employees no longer work at the company and they can’t locate their smartphones, laptops and other company devices. With the help of your expert, you eventually realize that all four people are still employed at the company and you get a termination order from the judge due to their dishonesty.

ESI – Discovery & Sanctions

Julie Thorpe-Lopez was not an expert on eDiscovery when the case began – and she wasn’t an expert when it finished either. But she was savvy enough to “know what she didn’t know.” With the help of eDiscovery expert Ryan Maxwell, she was able to leverage an incredibly favorable outcome for client in what looked like a losing case.

In this CLE course, Julie Lopez and Ryan Maxwell will detail how to obtain ESI in eDiscovery and how to avoid sanctions when producing ESI. Julie and Ryan will mainly discuss the attorney’s duty to preserve ESI, ESI best practices and sanctions for failing to properly handle electronically stored information. To access this course please click here: ESI Basics: Avoiding and Obtaining Discovery Sanctions.

Julie and Ryan will also discuss:

  • Scoping
  • Documentation
  • Defensible collection
  • Potential testimony
  • The Electronic Discovery Reference Model (EDRM)
  • Questionnaires/interviews
  • Data sources
  • Metadata
  • File systems
  • Defensible discovery
  • Motions to compel
  • Motions for sanctions
  • Using a discovery referee
  • Hiding electronic evidence

Julie Thorpe-Lopez is a Partner with Tatro & Lopez, LLP, and mainly represents clients who’ve suffered personal injury as a result of motor vehicle collisions, elder abuse and medical malpractice. Ryan Maxwell directs Epiq’s team of computer forensics analysts in southern California and manages the purpose-built computer forensics laboratory which he designed and established.

This CLE course is offered in the following states:

  • Alaska (AK)
  • Arizona (AZ)
  • California (CA)
  • Connecticut (CT)
  • District of Columbia (DC)
  • Illinois (IL)
  • Maryland (MD)
  • Massachusetts (MA)
  • Michigan (MI)
  • Missouri (MO)
  • New Hampshire (NH)
  • New Jersey (NJ)
  • New York (NY)
  • North Dakota (ND)
  • Pennsylvania (PA)
  • South Dakota (SD)

Attorney Credits offers CLE for attorneys in California and around the country. For more information about CLE in California please click the following link: CA CLE.

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

CLE Course on the Importance of Mobile Phone Forensics in Litigation

CX-TDTvU0AAHvdf

For many of us, the only time we’re not using your smartphone is when we are taking a shower – and I have to admit to checking my fantasy football scores in the shower. If you are like me, your smartphone is a text messaging device and a phone… and it’s also an Internet browser, a GPS device and the easiest way to send emails and check our stocks. Other people use their smartphone to post content to Facebook, Snapchat, Twitter, Vine, Instagram, Youtube and other social media and content sharing websites. We now live our lives through our phones, tablets and other mobile devices.

Mobile Phone Forensics

From a business and legal standpoint, the preservation and collection of electronically stored information (ESI) is central in today’s litigation landscape and is only complicated by smartphones and other mobile devices. Emails, presentations, spreadsheets, memos and even pictures & video can all be potentially responsive data sources. The challenge with this type of electronically stored information (ESI) is that it is often stored in a myriad of systems and mobile devices, and each system has its own preservation and collection nuances.

In this course, attorney and global eDiscovery & cyber forensics expert Paul Connolly describes the current landscape of mobile information collection and preservation and answers the vexing question of why attorneys so often overlook mobile data in the context of eDiscovery. Paul mainly discusses why collecting the data can be ethically challenging, expensive & potentially awkward, and he also provides some proactive policy and protocol ideas to bring clarity to your practice and electronic discovery of mobile devices.  To access the course please click here: Our Phones, Ourselves: The Importance of Mobile Phone Forensics in Litigation.

Additional topics covered in this CLE course include:

  • The prevalence of discoverable data on mobile devices
  • How preservation of employee text messages & other mobile data is frequently overlooked or botched
  • The practical issues faced when collecting data
  • Ethical complications
  • Privacy questions
  • Company BYOD (Bring Your Own Device) policies
  • Shadow BYOD policies

Paul K. Connolly is an attorney and Global E-Discovery & Cyber Forensics Expert with Duff and Phelps in Santa Monica, California. He has extensive case and workflow management responsibilities and handles internal investigations and “front page” enforcement actions by federal securities and antitrust regulators. Paul often works closely with internal counsel and compliance departments at international banks.

This CLE course is offered in the following states:

  • Alaska (AK)
  • Arizona (AZ)
  • California (CA)
  • Connecticut (CT)
  • District of Columbia (DC)
  • Illinois (IL)
  • Maryland (MD)
  • Massachusetts (MA)
  • Michigan (MI)
  • Missouri (MO)
  • New Hampshire (NH)
  • New Jersey (NJ)
  • New York (NY)
  • North Dakota (ND)
  • Pennsylvania (PA)
  • South Dakota (SD)

Attorney Credits offers continuing legal education (CLE) for attorneys in New York and around the country. For more information about CLE in New York please click the following link: NY CLE.

Tagged , , , , , , , , ,

New CLE Course on Ethics & ESI

screen-capture

Whether you’re in private, government, or corporate practice, you’re likely to deal with ESI (Electronically Stored Information) for a variety of transactional, litigation and business purposes. And as new technologies are developed and then become integrated into society and the practice of law, an attorney’s obligations under the ethical duty of competence continues to evolve. At a very minimum, attorney competence generally requires a basic understanding of, and facility with, issues relating to eDiscovery and the proper discovery of electronically stored information (ESI). The duty of competence may require a higher level of technical knowledge and ability depending on the e-discovery issues involved in a given matter and the nature of the ESI involved.

Failing to adhere to ethical standards in eDiscovery can lead to fines, reduced verdicts and even suspension from the practice of law.

In our brave new electronic world, digital pitfalls are truly lurking everywhere and this program will assist you in understanding the do’s and don’ts of eDiscovery by covering a number of pertinent ethical rules and recent case law in the area. This CLE program will mainly explore your ethical obligations in these areas: competence, the attorney-client privilege, client confidentiality, knowing where to look for ESI and intentionally withholding ESI. To access the course please click here: Ethics & ESI: Pitfalls and Practical Tips For the Wary Practitioner.

Further issues discussed in this CLE course include:

  • Rules of Professional Conduct
  • The Business & Professions Code
  • The ABA Model Rules
  • The Stored Communications Act
  • The I “heart” Hot Moms case
  • Electronic spoliation
  • Intentionally deleting electronic evidence
  • Removing Facebook photos & other social media evidence
  • Innocent deletion
  • Social media’s indefinite half life
  • Emails & the attorney client privilege
  • The work product doctrine
  • The responsibilities of partners & supervisory lawyer
  • The responsibilities of a subordinate lawyer
  • Responsibilities regarding nonlawyer assistance
  • Withholding electronic documents & emails
  • Qualcomm Inc. v. Broadcom Corp.
  • The penalties for failing to live up to ethical standards when conducing eDiscovery

Eric R. Deitz devotes much of his practice to the defense of attorneys and other professionals sued for malpractice. He also practices complex, estate and appellate litigation. Eric’s published opinions include In re Harris, 590 F.3d 730 (C.A.9, 2009) and Woolverton v. McCracken, 321 Ill.App.3d 440 (2001). Eric has tried multiple cases to verdict, including a statewide class action in California Superior Court. He also lectures on legal ethics, e-discovery, and document retention practices and policy. A member of the invitation-only Legal Ethics Committee of the San Diego County Bar Association, Eric currently serves on the committee’s executive board. Since 2013, Eric has been recognized by the Southern California edition of Super Lawyers® in the area of Professional Liability Defense.

This CLE course on ethics & ESI qualifies for legal ethics credit and is currently accredited in the following states:

  • Alaska (AK)
  • Arizona (AZ)
  • California (CA)
  • Connecticut (CT)
  • District of Columbia (DC)
  • Illinois (IL)
  • Maryland (MD)
  • Massachusetts (MA)
  • Michigan (MI)
  • New Jersey (NJ)
  • New York (NY)
  • Pennsylvania (PA)
  • South Dakota (SD)

Attorney Credits offers continuing legal education (CLE) for attorneys in New York and around the country. For more information about CLE in New York please click the following link: NY CLE.

Tagged , , , ,

Reducing E-Discovery Costs and Risks Through Litigation Readiness

screen-capture-1

The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) require that companies must be prepared to discuss the location and accessibility of potentially relevant electronically stored information (ESI) shortly after the litigation begins.  The federal (and many state) discovery rules and recent case law require the quick and effective imposition of a litigation hold on critical ESI before the lawsuit even begins.[1]  This presents numerous challenges for large companies that are generating voluminous amounts of electronic documents and emails.  Litigation has also become increasingly expensive and is only increasing in the areas of intellectual property, products liability, employment, securities and mergers & acquisitions.

  • How can you mitigate and reduce eDiscovery risks?
  • What is the best way to manage and reduce eDiscovery costs?
  • How do you leverage existing and implement new technologies to achieve discovery objectives?

In this CLE course DTI Associate General Counsel Jeff Jacobs will answer the questions above and provides points on how to reduce discovery costs and risks through litigation readiness.  The main topics addressed by Mr. Jacobs include case law & rule evolution, proactively addressing the eDiscovery challenge, records retention & policy review, eDiscovery process development, litigation holds and risk & cost mitigation.  To access the course please click here: Reducing E-Discovery Costs and Risks Through Litigation Readiness.

Additional topics addressed include:

  • Why eDiscovery matters
  • Discovery sanctions
  • Judicial intolerance for poor eDiscovery
  • Critical sanction cases
  • The EDRM (Electronic Discovery Reference Model)
  • Finding the relevant information
  • ESI assessment
  • Saving costs through effective retention & disposition
  • What judges want related to eDiscovery
  • The development of an effective litigation discovery response plan
  • The creation of a targeted data map

Jeff Jacobs is the General Counsel and Senior Consultant for DTI. For the past five years he has advised clients on litigation readiness, email & records retention and the planning & execution of electronic discovery matters.  Prior to joining DTI, Jeff spent seven years as an Associate Litigation Counsel at MCI/WorldCom, where he managed the electronic discovery associated with the government investigations of the WorldCom accounting fraud, related securities class actions and other litigation and the acquisition of MCI by Verizon.  He also served as counsel to the company’s Records and Information Management group and managed the subpoena compliance unit.  Before MCI, he was a Special Counsel in the litigation group of Sullivan & Cromwell’s Washington, DC office.  Jeff is a graduate of Williams College and the University of Chicago Law School and was in the first class of candidates to qualify as a certified electronic discovery specialist by the Association of Electronic Discovery Specialists (ACEDS).

This CLE course on reducing eDiscovery costs and risks through litigation readiness is currently accredited in the following states:

  • Alaska (AK)
  • Arizona (AZ)
  • California (CA)
  • Connecticut (CT)
  • District of Columbia (DC)
  • Illinois (IL)
  • Maryland (MD)
  • Massachusetts (MA)
  • Michigan (MI)
  • New Jersey (NJ)
  • Pennsylvania (PA)
  • South Dakota (SD)

Attorney Credits offers continuing legal education (CLE) for attorneys in New York and around the country.  For more information about CLE in New York please click the following link: NY CLE.

[1] Litigation holds must be imposed once a triggering event occurs and litigation is reasonably foreseeable.

Tagged , ,

I Think I Just Received eDiscovery: What Now?

Do you know what ESI is?

What are native files?

How do you respond to a litigation hold?

So you just received eDiscovery – what do you do know?  Do you know the proper steps to take? Unfortunately, despite the importance of eDiscovery in litigation today many attorneys still don’t even know the basics.  In today’s electronic world, being prepared to properly respond to eDiscovery demands can now make or break your client’s cases.  Join Alex Marjanovic of DTI as he provides insight into the most efficient way to respond to eDiscovery in one of our newest courses I Think I Just Received eDiscovery: What Now?.

screen-capture-2

Mr. Marjanovic covers three main areas, including the key terms you need to know to get results, litigation holds and the three primary methods that firms are currently handling e-discovery.  In reviewing the three primary eDiscovery methods, Mr. Marjanovic provides a cost benefit analysis and the potential for sanctions with each of the three methods: review on your computer, review hard copy of ESI and review in database.

The course further addresses many of the terms and ideologies that are commonly seen when working with ESI and litigation holds.  Attorneys taking this course should expect to learn about efficient e-discovery review & production, how to justify a Protective Order for production of electronic files due to burden of cost and what red flags to look for when trying to get a Motion to Compel for production of electronic documents.

screen-capture-1

Alex Marjanovic is the Regional Sales Director for DTI, a national provider of electronic discovery services, with responsibility for San Diego and Orange County, California.  Mr. Marjanovic has had extensive experience with electronic and paper-based discovery and related litigation production/discovery matters over the past nine years.  Mr. Marjanovic and his team of Litigation Consultants help in-house and outside counsel streamline their document reviews and productions by guiding them through efficient and cost effective electronic discovery technologies and methodologies.

This CLE course on eDiscovery is currently accredited in the following states:

  • Alaska (AK)
  • Arizona (AZ)
  • California (CA)
  • Connecticut (CT)
  • District of Columbia (DC)
  • Illinois (IL)
  • Maryland (MD)
  • Massachusetts (MA)
  • Michigan (MI)
  • New Jersey (NJ)
  • Pennsylvania (PA)
  • South Dakota (SD)

Attorney Credits offers continuing legal education (CLE) for attorneys in Illinois (IL) and around the country.  For more information about CLE in Illinois please click the following link: Illinois CLE.

Tagged , , , ,